Loch Ness monster legend

Loch Ness monster (in English: Loch Ness Monster) is a creature of uncertain existence, the group is believed to be a descendant of a survivor of Albulsourat (English: plesiosaurs), despite the fact that he described as different from a witness to another. He is said to live in Loch Ness in Scotland, the largest freshwater lake in Great Britain. Sir Peter Scott to name Nassiteras Rompopteriks (Latin: Nessiteras rhombopteryx) monster of the lake and in the journal Nature, a Greek name meaning "Ness monster with diamond-shaped fins

Innovate journalist and Water Commissioner for the Loch Ness, Alex Campbell, the word "monster" (English: Monster), on May 2, 1933, newspaper article in the Inverness Courier (English: Inverness Courier). On August 4, 1933, the paper ran an article about the allegations of a man from London named "George Specr", stating that when he was walking around the lake and his wife a few weeks ago, Raa, "more like a dragon or a creature Qpatarrakhi striking I've seen in my life," walking on the side of the road, carrying "an animal in his mouth.

After the publication of this article, I took the messages arrive to the newspaper, and often the most from unknown persons, they say they saw the monster on land or in water, on land or territory of their families, their knowledge, or tell them recounted the events of other people. Arrived quickly in these stories to all newspapers and publications British national, and later the international press, took the publishers talk about the "wild fish," "snake freely", or "dragon" people can see it in Scotland, before settling finally on a label uniform is "Loch Ness monster.

 On December 6, 1933, the publication of the first alleged picture of the beast, taken by "Hugh Gray," and that was after the monster was officially recognized by the Minister of State for Scotland, which called for the police to prevent any attack on the object. In 1934, increased attention to the case more than the first, after he emerged as "the image of the wound" (English: The Surgeon's Photograph) came into existence in the same year published lieutenant in the Royal Navy, Robert Thomas Gould, a book read by a lot of books like, talks in which his personal experience in the compilation of evidence for this object, which dates back to before the summer of 1933. Other writers claimed that the sightings of the beast back up to the sixth century.

The rumors and gossip about the existence of large animals living in the lake has existed for centuries, and the existence of some believers think that the monster of the lake views and provided circumstantial evidence in the health and existence of Nisie. Question section of interested health Views and show that the views were not known in ancient times and it was famous in the early sixties of the twentieth century with the advent of widespread interest to the legend Nisie, for example, vision alleged in October 1871 by Dr. Mackenzie, who described seeing "anything that moves slowly and then now moving faster and faster. "The repeated descriptions of those seen again without a record of vision by Dr. Mackenzie, which indicates that this watch may be incorrect

 The number of views recorded for monster lake around 5000 View since the thirties of the twentieth century until the present days, many of them questionable for several reasons, including distance, which was seen from the object or poor weather conditions which generated heavy fog does not allow anyone to rule correctly on the nature of what he saw , in addition to other factors, natural or man-made, it was found that many of the views of the deer or the waves of the boats had passed in the same area shortly before, and of course there were also many scams. On the other hand remains a part of the Views can not be explained easily, it may be true some of them already

With the arrival of the Romans in the first century AD to Scotland where they found a people called the people Aqbilaa Allbeckt Bouchm characterized by the body. This was an admirer of people and animals was recorded on the rocks, tales and legends related to them. Some of the inscriptions found with a description of the monster-like descriptions of the lake and some Nisie likely possibility to be the first record on the existence of this object, which dates back to about two thousand a year.

Received first viewing alleged monster of Loch Ness in 565 m, St. Columba (English: Saint Columba), which is one of the early missionaries and Christianity in Scotland, I have taken this seen by St. Adumannan Alioune (English: Saint Adomnán of Iona) in the seventh century. Describes Adumannan in his novel that, by a century after the occurrence of events, how could a priest of Ireland, St. Columba, who was home to the land of the people Allbeckt at the time with his companions, how he was able to save the life of a people from those people when they passed by them and buried their people near of the River Ness, they said to him that this deceased was swimming in the river when he was attacked by "a water monster," and the Bnhishh and dragging it under water, they tried to save him in the boat, but did not succeed but Pastrjall corpse.

 Stood Colomba after hearing this story, stunned people Allbeckt, by sending a "Lewin Moco Min" to swim in the river, appeared the beast and chased him, but Columba made ​​a sign of the cross and took prays to God and order the monster to go in peace, he said: "I do not make more, do not touch the son of Adam, Come back soon, "obeyed the beast in the case as if the" ropes pulled it back, "and fled in panic were rescued person. Columba took the men and Allbeckt Gentiles praise God for this miracle

Icentd believers, the existence of the beast to the story, which takes place in the River Ness, rather than the lake itself, for The Charlie that this object was, and still exists since the sixth century. Skeptics say its credibility, as the stories of monsters water was so familiar in the biographies of the saints of the Middle Ages; and thus, the story of Adumannan may not be the only copies of a common story from that region. Say skeptics also the story of St. Columba is the story is completely independent of the myth Loch Ness Monster current, and it did not link them only recently of the existence of the object by the faithful who wish to support their statements.

Historian says, "Anthony Charles Thomas" in one of his essays, that there was any way none of Health in this novel, it is likely to have been interpreted incorrectly, Valkadis Columba perhaps he had seen wild boar or rude or any other animal was swimming in the river , since it did not specify the nature of the beast. in addition, View St., near the river and not the Loch Ness lake, and that St. Roy itself to many different views of monsters in different areas of Scotland. Says of the "T. Binns," This novel is more novels ancient serious about the beast, and adds that all the other novels dating back to before 1933 can not be invoked to correct, as it does not prove that there was any knowledge of a broad for this object or any culture local emerging about.

 Views ground back to a strange creature on Loch Ness in the modern era to the sixteenth century, but what sparked the interest in the lake monster was Al Spicer incident on July 22, 1933, when he saw George Spicer and his wife, "a strange creature," crossing the road in front of their car. Described the couple created as a body is huge, with a meter in height (4 feet) and range in length from his body between 1.5 to 8 meters (25 feet), has a neck of a wavy shape thicker a little elephant ranges in width of 3.0 and 3.7 meters (10 -12 feet) in street View. But they could not see any of the parties to the creature because he was at a low level of the ground. By the way the creature in front of them quickly toward the lake, which lies about 20 meters (20 yards), leaving traces of his body on the plant splintered bass

In August 1933 he claimed a motorcyclist named Arthur Grant, he almost slammed into a created being as he was riding his bicycle near the northeastern shore of the lake at about one o'clock at night, and claimed Grant that he saw the head small, connected to the neck long, and the creature he saw Across the road on the run to the lake. Grant said that he got off the bike and followed the creature, but did not see only a ripple at the coast of the lake. But some people say that this is not the only comic to justify the collision occurred near the Grant

In view of the other in 1934, claimed the young maid, "Margaret Monroe," she saw the creature for 20 minutes, about six o'clock in the morning of June 5, and Margaret was located about 180 meters (200 yards) from the creature. And described as having skin like elephant skin, a long neck, small head and has two short front legs or fins, and ended seen the return of the creature to the water. Views ground continued until 1963 when the emergence of low-quality film portrays the creature of Libai

In May 1943 claimed one of the Corps of control of ownership (English: Royal Observer Corps) that he saw the creature Mzaanva "big eyes" in the lake located about 230 meters (250 yards), ranging length from 6 to 9 meters (20 to 30 feet), with long neck length ranged between 1.2 to 1.5 meters (4-5 feet) of water when directed by

In December 1954 managed fishing vessel called "peer-III" (English: Rival III), and equipped with sonar to capture the movement of a foreign body cope with the boat under the water at a depth of 146 meters (480 feet) has continued to monitor the movement for a distance of 800 meters before to cut off contact with this body. Many people have tried to find the monster by sonar before, but most of these attempts were inconclusive or negative outcome.

 On June 17, 1993 reported seen by two people who are Mckinnas and David Mackay, where they said they saw a creature stranger up in length to about 40 feet, brown being the direction of the lake. In the evening the same day were reported seen by James Macintosh and his young son to the strange creature being towards the lake. the Last seen was from Lorraine Davidson and that did not see the creature, but saw a large wave of strange in the lake suggests that there is a large creature swims beneath

First picked up a picture of the monster in 1933 by "Hugh Gray," who said "What I saw that thing that was Ialo about two feet or three from the surface of the water until it brought the machine imaging and picked up his image. I did not see his head, and I think that the limbs were all under water , as there was not any little movement of the tail

 Is "the image of the wound" (English: Surgeon's Photograph) taken by a gynecologist Dr. Robert Wilson of London, the most famous images that showed Loch Ness monster at all, and was faithful to the existence of the object base in the past as evidence of the existence of a strong monster. The importance of this is the only being shown "the head and neck" - on the contrary from all the previous image that shows only the camshafts or disturbances in the water. Appears that the picture was a hoax in 1994

 Photo was taken in 1934, and published in the newspaper "Daily Mail" on April 21, 1934, and Wilson had refused to name is the nickname of him, fired by "the image of the wound" instead match the ripples in the image size and the pattern of ripples small circular, conflicting with the enormous waves that appear when shooting close-up, and the analysis of the original image is clipped raises many other questions. The makers the Discovery Channel Communications, the documentary "discovered Loch Ness" (English: Loch Ness Discovered) to conduct analysis on the nature of the original image and dimensions in which the size of the waves surrounding the body found inside, and found that there is a body white prominently in each copy, which means that it was exists on the negative image. The narrator says in that episode of the program: "It seems that this body is the source of ripples in the water, as if there was something dripping form of the beast, but science can not rule out the idea that the white is just the negative image of the defect." According to the full analysis of the image that the body seems not exceed the length of one meter

Was said in 1979 that this is not only a picture of an elephant swimming does not show him only part of the head and trunk. Sceptics said others in the eighties that the picture belonged to a bird dive into the water or the otter, but after that the Christian Sperling made ​​his own admission, most of them agreed on what the latter - that the beast in the picture not only for the submarine game plugged into the sculpted head of completed images. Have been detailed in the manufacture of a special book. Admitted Christian Sperling on his deathbed that this is false, and that he had made ​​a model of the neck of the beast with the head of the wood plastic and place it in the lake in agreement with Dr. Robert Wilson, who died several years ago of this recognition, which in turn filmed the form and display the image on the means of media claiming that he picked up a true picture of the monster of Loch Ness and Christian Sperling said that he had done so to deceive the press and the media, especially newspaper "daily Mail" in reprisal for Mafloh his family.

 As the husband and his mother, he had faked footprints on the shore of the lake and claimed it footprints Loch Ness Monster, but the experts from the Daily Mail, who had asked him evidence of the beast they discovered that the effects of foot fakes, which raised the media, to expose the lie, the mother and husband in a manner to make provocative satire of the latter ridiculed by the people. Austrian says the world "Henry Bauer," to expose this story is evidence of bias in terms of skeptics, and wonder why the conspirators do not reveal deceived at an earlier date in order to Ihrjoa newspaper. He also claimed that plastic wood did not exist in 1934, although he was available as a modeling and cottage industry in the early thirties

 In 1938 managed to tourists from South Africa, called the c. E. Taylor, that depicts scenes of the creature for 3 minutes on the color film 16 millimeters, is now in possession of Dr. Maurice Burton and who refuses to allow the Mhakqiqin and those interested in monster of the lake, such as Peter Costello or the Office of Research Loch age, familiarized themselves with the film. The back of a single scene from the movie in the book Burton, "the elusive beast" (English: The Elusive Monster), the last before retiring. Dr. Roy Makkal, a biologist and researcher Kadeer in the study of animals hidden, that the film is "proof positive" screening at a later time to the National Institute of Oceanography, now known as Centre Southampton Oceanography, where he saw a number of experts and agreed that What it shows is not only a rigid body roams the lake.

In 1960 was able to flight engineer called "Tim Dansdal" that depicts a foreign body cross the lake, leaving behind waves differ from those left behind by Alzorac normal. Suppose the National Council for the dissemination of images in the United Kingdom have shown that the photographer was "probably alive". While skeptics said that these waves can be from a boat and that the "hump" profile can not be excluded that the body of this boat. Others hoped that by what has been filmed is a wave caused by an unknown source, and went in the lake, and that when you speed up the film, a man can be seen clearly, sitting in the boat.

The Discovery Channel Communications in 1993 to produce a documentary entitled "discovered Loch Ness" (English: Loch Ness Discovered) appeared in a film the aforementioned enhanced technology, digital, according to an expert who examined the film that there remained in the negative images of the film does not appear in the positive images, and after improvement and development of film and installation of tires, the back of what appears to be the back of the body, in addition to the rear fins and between Haddptin hump or two on the body of plesiosaur-like body. This expert says: "I think that talking about the Loch Ness monster was not only a nonsense, before I saw the movie, but now, I am not sure."

 
Others have objected to this analysis and said that the angle at which the images of this film was a ray intersecting with the angle of the rod in the sun that day, making it impossible for the emergence of the shadow under the water at the time. Some believers say the skeptics, that this figure is likely to be the photographer water is formed Mekrh look like the back of the body of plesiosaur from the accident. But the same people also say that there may be a small body, a head or hump, located in front of the first hump, which has caused the emergence of this form. However, the improvement of the film showed what appeared to be a second cam and the cam is also a third more likely

 On May 26, 2007 managed a technical Almkhprien aged 55 years, called "Gordon Holmes," was able to pick up film of the creature "jet black in length up to 14 meters (45 feet) walking quickly toward the water." Says marine scientist at the center of Loch Ness 2000 in the village "Dromnadroushat" Scottish, "Adrian Shine," that he had seen the movie and intends his analysis, he said that the film is the best picture ever Views. Branch has the BBC in Scotland to broadcast the tape on May 29, 2007, and hosted the program "News ST in" Holmes on May 28, 2007, and the pictures during this interview, which appeared also Adrian Shine said that the images may in fact be the otter, seal, or waterfowl.

Holmes's credibility has been questioned in an article on the "Krebtomendo", which states that the latter date Palmshahdat alleged unconfirmed creatures exist, and that he sold a book he published himself provides the evidence on the existence of fairies. Also, this film does not have any other purpose to show the size of the beast by comparing it. A team program "to pursue the beast" (English: The Monster Quest) to investigate in this film in the episode "Death of Loch Ness" (English: Death of Loch Ness), where the evidence examining the death of Nissi, in addition to a number of other images

 A claimed security guards, called "Jason Cook," was found on the Loch Ness monster using a mapping program "Google Earth". This image shows a large body of four parties, and skeptics say that this is due to the boat, but the researchers are planning specialists the question of the beast to study a more detailed

Sir Edward Mountain, the founder of "Eagle Star" for insurance, has read the book written by Lt. Robert Thomas Gould monster of the lake, and decided to fund the mission shift involving 20 men equipped with binoculars and cameras, are distributed around the lake from nine o'clock am until six pm, starting from July 13, 1934 and for 5 weeks. 25 photos were taken throughout this specified period, but none of them was inconclusive. Was the captain, "James Fraser" has joined the mission team also, and remained near the lake after the end of five weeks, during which he took a film of an object on September 15, 1934. When experts examine the film, now lost, they discovered that the object was not only a seal, perhaps a gray seal.

 Proposed a field researcher at the New York water, "Andrew Carroll," a 1969 survey of the lake by mobile Sonar, The project was funded by the Foundation Greaves, named after the Nixon Greaves, director of the exhibition of water at the time. This project was the last part, and the most successful program of the Office of the investigations of the phenomenon of Loch Ness in 1969, which included research by Algatsat with Aharbat Alkhzeih. Began to survey the lake by traction in October of the same year, the sonar picked up in one of these surveys echo vital for about 3 minutes in the north of the lake, and still the source of this echo is known even today. Subsequent studies have shown that the severity of the echo was twice as apostate-expected issuance of a whale in the guide up to a length of 3 meters (10 feet), the largest animals that can enter the lake. Sonar information subject to greater scrutiny when sent to the University of Chicago, by biologist Makkal Roy and his colleagues, and confirmed that the dimensions of the body that it bounced sound up to 6 meters (20 feet).

 In 1970, during the so-called "campaign, the large", the biologist, "Roy Makkal", who worked as a teacher for 20 years at the University of Chicago searching for monster lake through the use of a hydrophone, a registration system under the water of the votes, with a set them at a depth of 210 meters (700 feet) in the Gulf, "Urquhart," and put two others on the depth of 180 and 360 meters respectively (300 and 600 feet). Been retrieved the tape, which was the subject inside the barrel with the other sensitive parts of the audio system, after two nights of put it in the lake, was presented to the Office investigated the phenomenon of Loch Ness.

 Experts said after hearing the recording that the sound being picked Alheidrofon the most profound was a "peep Kzkzkh birds," and indicates the severity of this voices that was the source of a greater depth. In October of the same year was recorded "road" and "clicks" from Hedrovon last in the Gulf, experts said they are likely to be specific to the site by echo, and followed these voices "rustle Adtarabaa" shows the movement of the tail push the object water. Scientists said that these voices and the movement that followed and caused a disturbance may be issued from the object is to locate its prey by echo before the attempt to emulate them and acting largely

The scientists observed that the voices were stopped when the boats move on the surface of the lake, then return to the issue is to keep away from the boat to a safe distance. The past experience has shown that the density and intensity of sounds up to a depth of less than 30 meters (100 feet). Officials decided in the office of investigations the phenomenon of Loch Nessto try to connect to a created being by broadcasting those voices that have been recordedpreviously in the bottom of the lake and waiting for the result, which came out different each time, as it often is to hear and record sounds with patterns and different unit from those previous At other times was quite similar. Makkal said that the recorded sounds were different from thehundreds of other voices for animals for the issuing of water known as sounds similar, and added that "the competent authorities confirm that none of the objects lake dweller is able toissue any such appeals "

   .